How to Plan CSR Spend Across the Financial Year (Avoiding the March Rush)
- Marpu Foundation

- 11 hours ago
- 10 min read
Most Indian companies plan their CSR spend in March.
Not the strategy. The strategy is usually approved by the board in April or May. But the actual deployment of funds, the partner selection, the on-ground execution, the impact reporting? That tends to bunch up in the last quarter of the financial year, when audit deadlines and board reporting calendars start showing up.
This is how the March CSR rush happens. It is one of the most common patterns across Indian companies under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013. And it is one of the biggest reasons CSR budgets get spent without delivering the impact they were meant to.
The good news is that this is fixable. With a year-long planning approach, the same CSR budget can do significantly more, the documentation becomes cleaner, the BRSR reporting becomes easier, and the company avoids the operational chaos of trying to deploy crores in eight weeks.
This article walks you through how to plan CSR spend across the financial year in India. It covers the planning cadence quarter by quarter, the questions to ask at each stage, and the operational habits that separate companies with calm Marches from companies with chaotic ones.
Why the March CSR Rush Happens (CSR Spend Across the Financial Year)
Before fixing the problem, it helps to understand why it shows up so consistently across Indian companies, regardless of sector or size.
Late board approvals. The CSR committee usually meets after the annual financial results are finalized. By the time the annual CSR action plan is approved, June or July is often gone.
Mid-year strategy changes. A new CSR head joins. Leadership transitions shift priorities. The board decides to refocus on a different cause area. Each of these resets the planning clock.
Partner selection delays. Identifying the right implementation partner, conducting due diligence, finalizing the MoU, and getting legal and procurement sign-off can easily take two to three months on its own.
On-ground delays. Monsoon disruptions, festival closures, beneficiary mobilization gaps, government permission timelines. These are normal in India, and they push schedules.
The result. Funds that should have started deploying in Q1 only start moving by Q3. Q4 then becomes the catch-up quarter, and CSR teams find themselves trying to deploy seventy or eighty percent of their annual budget in the final twelve weeks.

What the March Rush Actually Costs You
The visible cost of the March rush is operational stress. The hidden costs are bigger.
Programme quality drops. A partner selected in February has no time to design a programme that fits your strategy. They run their default activity, you write the cheque, and the impact ends up being whatever the partner was already going to do anyway.
Due diligence gets compressed. Vetting an NGO partner properly takes time. Audited financials, board governance, project documentation, beneficiary verification systems. Under March pressure, all of this gets reduced to a quick reference check, which is how partnerships with weak NGOs get formed.
Documentation gaps appear. CSR audit and BRSR reporting both require records of beneficiaries, geographies, project outcomes, and fund utilization. When a programme runs for only a few weeks, documentation gets retrofitted, and retrofitted documentation does not hold up well under scrutiny.
Impact assessment becomes impossible. A programme that runs from February to March cannot generate outcome data. The company ends up with output numbers (trees planted, students trained, kits distributed) but no real evidence that anything changed for the beneficiary.
Strategic standing erodes. When the board reviews the annual CSR report, they see activity but no insight. Over time, this weakens the standing of the CSR function inside the company. CSR stops being seen as strategic and starts being seen as a compliance line item.
None of this is theoretical. These are the patterns most Indian CSR teams describe when asked privately why their previous year felt rushed.
Q1 (April to June): Strategy, Approval, and Partner Identification
The first quarter is where the year is won or lost. What you do in these three months decides whether the rest of the year runs cleanly or scrambles to the finish.
Finalize the annual CSR action plan. Section 135 requires every company within scope to have an annual action plan approved by the board. This plan should specify the focus areas, the geographies, the rough budget allocation, and the implementation partners. The earlier this is approved, the more runway the rest of the year gets.
Convene the CSR committee early. The CSR committee should meet in April or early May, not in June or July. An April meeting gives the team a clear two-month head start, and that head start compounds across all four quarters.
Begin partner identification. Identifying potential implementation partners can begin even before the formal action plan is approved. Shortlist three to five NGOs per focus area. Request their audited financials, governance documents, project portfolios, and beneficiary documentation systems. Build a partner shortlist that the CSR committee can review in the next meeting.
Set up the documentation system. Decide now how beneficiary data, project photographs, expense vouchers, geo-tags, and outcome metrics will be captured throughout the year. Companies that decide this in March end up with reporting gaps. Companies that decide this in April have clean year-end reports.
Lock the first programme. Aim to have at least one major CSR programme moving by end of June. Even a partial deployment, a pilot, or a foundational activity starts the year on the right foot and creates organisational momentum that carries through the rest of the year.
Q2 (July to September): Programme Launch and First Quarter Execution
By the second quarter, programmes should be moving on the ground. This is the quarter where deployment of funds, mobilization of beneficiaries, and on-ground execution should be in full swing.
Launch the major programmes. July is the operational start of most field-based CSR programmes in India. Schools have reopened, monsoon has stabilized in most regions, and rural mobilization becomes possible.
Run the first quarterly review. End of September is the first checkpoint. How much of the annual budget has been deployed? Are programmes running to plan? Are partners delivering? Are beneficiaries being reached as projected? This review should be formal, documented, and shared with the CSR committee.
Course correct early. If a programme is underperforming or a partner is not delivering, September is when to make changes. Waiting until December or January means the entire year is lost. Early course correction is what separates strong CSR programmes from average ones.
Begin documentation review. Pull a sample of the documentation captured in Q2. Are beneficiary records complete? Are photographs geo-tagged where required? Are expense vouchers tied to specific activities? Fix any gaps now, while there is still time.
Q3 (October to December): Mid-Year Review and Strategic Adjustment
The third quarter is the heart of the CSR year. By December, sixty to seventy percent of the annual budget should be either deployed or committed to specific activities.
Hold a formal mid-year CSR committee review. A documented mid-year review with the CSR committee should happen in October or November. This is when the year-end picture starts becoming visible and when strategic adjustments can still be made without compressing timelines.
Assess outcomes, not just outputs. Outputs are what was delivered (number of beneficiaries, trees planted, kits distributed). Outcomes are what changed (livelihoods improved, learning levels measured, health indicators tracked). Mid-year is when outcome measurement becomes possible. Companies that wait until March can only report outputs.
Plan for Q4 documentation. Annual CSR reports require board-approved formats, partner-certified utilisation reports, and impact assessments where applicable. Begin drafting these in December rather than March.
Verify Schedule VII fit. This is the quarter to verify that all activities funded under CSR genuinely fit the activities listed under Schedule VII of the Companies Act. Any activity that does not fit needs to be flagged and addressed before year-end.
Q4 (January to March): Delivery, Assessment, and Reporting
The fourth quarter should be the cleanest part of the year, not the most chaotic.
Complete final deployment. Any remaining budget should be deployed in January and February, not in the last week of March. Late-March deployments are the ones that struggle in audit scrutiny.
Conduct impact assessment. Where programmes run for the full year, impact assessment data should be collected in February and analysed in early March. The annual CSR report should reflect this assessment, not just activity counts.
Finalize the unspent CSR position. If any funds remain unspent, the company needs to plan whether they will be transferred to a specified fund under Schedule VII or to the company's own unspent CSR account, in line with the Companies Act provisions. This decision should be made well before March 31, not at the deadline.
Draft the annual CSR report. The annual report on CSR activities, which forms part of the board's report, should be in draft form by mid-March. This gives the CSR committee time to review and the board time to approve before the financial year closes.
A Month-by-Month CSR Planning Calendar
Companies that want a simple working calendar can follow this rhythm.
April: Annual CSR action plan finalized, CSR committee meeting held, partner shortlisting begins.
May: Partner due diligence, MoU drafting, documentation systems finalized, first programme designs locked.
June: First programmes launched, first deployment of funds, monthly partner check-in cadence established.
July to August: Major programmes operational, monthly partner reviews, beneficiary mobilization underway.
September: First formal quarterly review, course corrections agreed, Q3 plan adjusted.
October to November: Mid-year CSR committee review, outcome measurement begins, partner mid-year reports collected.
December: Documentation review, Schedule VII fit check, draft annual report outline begins.
January: Final deployment of remaining budget, impact assessment data collection.
February: Impact assessment analysis, annual CSR report drafting, audit preparation begins.
March: Final reporting, board approval of annual CSR report, unspent CSR decisions finalized, audit walkthrough.
This calendar isn't rigid. Different sectors and different programmes have their own seasonal logic. Education programmes track the school calendar. Agricultural programmes track sowing and harvest cycles. Health programmes track public health calendars. But the underlying principle holds across all of them: spread the planning, deployment, and review across all twelve months, and the year stops feeling like a sprint to March.
Common Mistakes That Push CSR Spend Into March
A few patterns show up across Indian companies, regardless of sector or size.
Treating CSR as a Q4 task. When CSR planning happens only after the annual financial results are confirmed, three months are already gone before the team even starts. CSR should be a year-round function with its own annual planning cycle, separate from the financial reporting cycle.
Single-event activations. A one-day event in March can deploy a few lakhs but cannot deploy crores with discipline. Multi-quarter programmes are the only way to deploy large CSR budgets with real impact.
Late partner onboarding. New partners onboarded in February cannot deliver year-end impact. Partner relationships should be built in Q1 so that programmes can run for the full available window.
Documentation done at the end. Reconstructing documentation in March is when audit and BRSR reporting risks creep in. Documentation should be a continuous activity captured during execution, not a year-end retrofit.
Ignoring the unspent CSR provisions. Funds that remain unspent have specific treatment under the Companies Act. Companies that ignore these provisions until March 31 end up making rushed decisions about fund transfers or carry-forward, which is exactly when compliance gets messy.
Why Multi-Quarter Programmes Beat End-of-Year Activations
The single biggest shift any CSR team can make is moving from event-based activations to multi-quarter programmes.
A multi-quarter programme allows beneficiaries to be reached repeatedly. It allows partners to build trust on the ground. It allows outcomes to be measured rather than just outputs counted. And it allows the company to report substantive impact in the annual CSR report rather than activity logs.
It also smooths out the financial planning. Spend happens predictably across the year rather than in lumps that strain procurement, partner banking systems, and audit trails.
A one-day Environment Day plantation event in June and a one-day December volunteering event might together deploy a few lakhs and produce nice photographs, but they will not produce a programme that can be defended in front of an audit committee or a BRSR reviewer. A six-month skill development programme, a year-long Miyawaki forest, or a multi-quarter water and sanitation programme each absorb larger budgets, deliver measurable outcomes, and produce documentation that holds up under scrutiny.
The shift from events to programmes is the shift from CSR-as-activity to CSR-as-strategy. It is also the shift from a March rush to a calm year-end.
How Marpu Foundation Works With Companies on Year-Long CSR Planning
At Marpu Foundation, we work with companies across India on multi-quarter CSR programmes that begin in Q1 and run through the financial year. Our partnership model is built around three principles: early planning, continuous documentation, and outcome-driven reporting.
We currently work with corporate partners across 23+ Indian states on programmes spanning environment, education, skill development, healthcare, and community development. Our 85 percent partner retention rate reflects what year-long planning makes possible. Companies that plan their CSR with us in April rarely find themselves in a March rush.
For CSR teams looking to move from event-based CSR to year-long programme-based CSR, the conversation begins with understanding your focus areas, your geographies, and your reporting requirements. From there, we co-design a multi-quarter programme that fits Schedule VII, supports your BRSR reporting, and delivers measurable outcomes.
To start that conversation, write to us at connect@marpu.org or visit marpu.org. The earlier in the year that conversation begins, the cleaner your March will look.
Frequently Asked Questions
When should companies start planning their annual CSR spend?
Ideally in April, the first month of the financial year. The board-approved annual CSR action plan, partner identification, and documentation systems should all be in place by end of June. Companies that begin planning in Q3 or Q4 are already in catch-up mode.
What is an annual CSR action plan?
Under the Companies (CSR Policy) Rules, every company within Section 135 scope must have an annual action plan recommended by the CSR committee and approved by the board. The plan specifies focus areas, geographies, budget allocations, implementation partners, modalities of execution, and monitoring and reporting mechanisms.
How often should the CSR committee meet?
While the Companies Act sets minimum requirements, well-run CSR functions hold quarterly committee meetings: one in April for annual planning, one in September for first review, one in November or December for mid-year review, and one in March for annual approval.
What is the unspent CSR account under the Companies Act?
If a company is unable to spend its full CSR obligation in a financial year, the unspent amount linked to ongoing projects is transferred to a separate Unspent CSR Account in a scheduled bank within 30 days from the end of the financial year. Other unspent amounts have separate treatment under the Companies Act provisions. CSR teams should engage their company secretarial and finance teams on the specific treatment well before March 31.
Why do most Indian companies face a March CSR rush?
The most common reasons are late board approvals, mid-year strategy changes, slow partner onboarding, on-ground execution delays from monsoon and festival cycles, and the habit of treating CSR as a year-end compliance task rather than a year-round strategic function.



Comments